This project is a multi-methodological evaluation of a large NSF-funded project: Cascadia Coastlines and Peoples Hazards Research Hub (Cascadia CoPes hub).  The Hub is a major 5 year $20M project that will inform and enable integrated hazard assessment, mitigation, and adaptation through targeted scientific advancement and modeling co-produced in sustained collaboration with coastal communities in the Pacific Northwest. The Hub project work involves a robust co-production process including universities, government, and tribal and community organizations. CORD, in collaboration with Eric Welch (C-STEPS, ASU) is leading the external evaluation of the Hub. Our evaluation provides ongoing formative feedback to the Hub team, and an annual assessment of project activities and developments.  Evaluation data are based on annual surveys, social network analysis, interviews and observation, and analysis of team production.

Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) programs across the nation struggle with retention of students, which stems from a number of issues. CORD is the external evaluator for the Georgia Tech NSF RED grant (“Adapting and Implementing Interactive Problem-Driven Learning, Professional and Computational Skills Development for Early and Vertically-Integrated Engagement”). The purpose of the project is to develop an effective and scalable model to revolutionize CEE education through curricular and other changes. The evaluation supports the project through an examination of the CEE culture and overall environment, student experiences, including transfers in and out of CEE.  

CORD is leading the research evaluation of two NSF-funded Regional Innovation Engines (RIE) planning awards with the goal of both strengthening the project in this planning phase, and preparing for evaluation in a full RIE phase. The RIE program was launched by the U.S. National Science Foundation as a significant new program aimed at strengthening innovation capacity through the development of new regional innovation ecosystems. The evaluations focus on issues including regional needs and opportunities, team and partner development, institutional readiness and team cohesion. The evaluations are developmental in informing the progress of the Type 1 planning activities. They also provide a summative evidence base of the team readiness for the Type 2 proposal as well as a detailed evaluation plan for the full project.