The 2021 National Defense Authorization Act required a Report on Restructuring and Coordination of Social, Management and Information Science to understand how DoD can more effectively and efficiently support research across DoD and the IC. The purpose of this project was to collect and analyze primary data from structured interviews on the processes and protocols currently utilize by personnel who fund social science research across the DoD. This included program managers from all service branches, relevant COCOM personnel, DoD-funded laboratories, and FFRDCs. Analysis of these interviews were delivered to OUSD (R and E) as part of a report articulating the structural challenges of funding and transitioning science important for understanding and modeling human sciences. The report was also the basis of a report to Congress detailing the structural challenges of DoD social science related research programs.
 

This project is a multi-methodological evaluation of a large NSF-funded project: Cascadia Coastlines and Peoples Hazards Research Hub (Cascadia CoPes hub).  The Hub is a major 5 year $20M project that will inform and enable integrated hazard assessment, mitigation, and adaptation through targeted scientific advancement and modeling co-produced in sustained collaboration with coastal communities in the Pacific Northwest. The Hub project work involves a robust co-production process including universities, government, and tribal and community organizations. CORD, in collaboration with Eric Welch (C-STEPS, ASU) is leading the external evaluation of the Hub. Our evaluation provides ongoing formative feedback to the Hub team, and an annual assessment of project activities and developments.  Evaluation data are based on annual surveys, social network analysis, interviews and observation, and analysis of team production.

CORD is leading the research evaluation of two NSF-funded Regional Innovation Engines (RIE) planning awards with the goal of both strengthening the project in this planning phase, and preparing for evaluation in a full RIE phase. The RIE program was launched by the U.S. National Science Foundation as a significant new program aimed at strengthening innovation capacity through the development of new regional innovation ecosystems. The evaluations focus on issues including regional needs and opportunities, team and partner development, institutional readiness and team cohesion. The evaluations are developmental in informing the progress of the Type 1 planning activities. They also provide a summative evidence base of the team readiness for the Type 2 proposal as well as a detailed evaluation plan for the full project.

This project addresses the topic of global social innovation in science capacity in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic massively disrupted science worldwide, and the purpose of this project is to understand how teams have innovated to minimize these effects on their research activities. We focus on three intertwining features of the social dynamics of international collaborative teams: Social innovation, Adaptation and Resilience, and Learning and Transferability. Social innovation refers to new and different ways of modifying individual and group behavior within the context of team science. The project involves a series of case studies focused around distinct internationally collaborative teams funded through the US NSF or the European Commission. We focus on teams that are new emergent collaborations that establish norms for interaction during the pandemic but also adaptive collaborations that adjust to the barriers and constraints of the pandemic. We use a novel methodological approach to identifying teams using advanced computing techniques in a new and robust bibliometric dataset, complemented by other snowball sampling techniques. The project will conclude with an international workshop to share and disseminate findings that further international collaboration.